Samuel Whitner v. Disciplinary Counsel

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:12-cv-01876-CMC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999029937]. Mailed to: Samuel Whitner. [12-7784]

Appeal: 12-7784

Doc: 14

Filed: 01/25/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7784

SAMUEL LAMONT WHITNER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL LESLEY
TIFFANY N. RICHARDSON,

M.

COGGIOLA;

STAFF

ATTORNEY

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia.
Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (3:12-cv-01876-CMC)

Submitted:

January 22, 2013

Decided: January 25, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel Lamont Whitner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7784

Doc: 14

Filed: 01/25/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Samuel

Lamont

Whitner

appeals

the

district

court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing Whitner’s civil action.
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record

Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.
Counsel

Lesley

M.

Sept. 13, 2012).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

Coggiola,

No.

Whitner v. Disciplinary

3:12-cv-01876-CMC

(D.S.C.

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2