US v. Timothy Nixon

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 3:00-cr-00222-GCM-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999053373]. Mailed to: Timothy Nixon. [12-7814]

Appeal: 12-7814

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/28/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7814

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
TIMOTHY JEROME NIXON,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00222-GCM-1)

Submitted:

February 26, 2013

Decided:

February 28, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Timothy Jerome Nixon, Appellant Pro Se.
Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-7814

Doc: 5

Filed: 02/28/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Timothy
order

denying

(2006).
error.

a

Jerome

Nixon

reduction

appeals

of

sentence,

the
18

district
U.S.C.

court’s

§ 3582(c)

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court.

See United States v. Nixon, No. 3:00-cr-00222-

GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. Oct. 5, 2012).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2