Johnathan Simmons v. John Vicker

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00653-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999010681]. Mailed to: Simmons. [12-7846, 12-7848]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7846 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2012 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7846 JOHNATHAN SIMMONS, a/k/a Jonathan Dale Simmons, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. JOHN VICKERS; MICHAEL NAJJAR; WARDEN MCCALL; OFFICER SMITH, et al, Defendants - Appellees. No. 12-7848 JONATHAN DALE SIMMONS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SCDC; JOHN VICKERS; MICHAEL NAJJAR; WARDEN MCCALL; OFFICER SMITH, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Aiken. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (1:09-cv-00653-TLW; 1:09-cv-00858-TLW) Submitted: December 20, 2012 Decided: December 27, 2012 Appeal: 12-7846 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2012 Pg: 2 of 3 Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jonathan Dale Simmons, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 12-7846 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/27/2012 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Jonathan Simmons appeals the district court’s order denying as untimely his motion to alter or amend the court’s order awarding the Defendants summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and find Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Simmons v. Vickers, No. 1:09-cv- 00653-TLW; Simmons v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. 1:09-cv-00858-TLW (D.S.C. Oct. 3; Oct. 2 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?