Johnathan Simmons v. John Vicker
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00653-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999010681]. Mailed to: Simmons. [12-7846, 12-7848]
Appeal: 12-7846
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/27/2012
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7846
JOHNATHAN SIMMONS, a/k/a Jonathan Dale Simmons,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN VICKERS; MICHAEL NAJJAR; WARDEN MCCALL; OFFICER SMITH,
et al,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 12-7848
JONATHAN DALE SIMMONS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SCDC; JOHN VICKERS; MICHAEL NAJJAR; WARDEN MCCALL; OFFICER
SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of South Carolina, at Aiken.
Terry L. Wooten, District Judge.
(1:09-cv-00653-TLW; 1:09-cv-00858-TLW)
Submitted:
December 20, 2012
Decided:
December 27, 2012
Appeal: 12-7846
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/27/2012
Pg: 2 of 3
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jonathan Dale Simmons, Appellant Pro Se.
James Victor McDade,
DOYLE, O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 12-7846
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/27/2012
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Jonathan
Simmons
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
denying as untimely his motion to alter or amend the court’s
order awarding the Defendants summary judgment on his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2006) complaint.
no reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
Simmons v. Vickers, No. 1:09-cv-
00653-TLW; Simmons v. S.C. Dep’t of Corr., No. 1:09-cv-00858-TLW
(D.S.C. Oct. 3; Oct. 2 2012).
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?