Agnes Holbrook v. Judge Jone

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:12-cv-00380-MFU-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999076771].. [12-7869]

Download PDF
Appeal: 12-7869 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/01/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-7869 AGNES BERNICE HOLBROOK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. HONORABLE JUDGE JONES; PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE, UNKNOWN PERSONS AT THE FEDERAL Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District Judge. (7:12-cv-00380-MFU-RSB) Submitted: March 28, 2013 Decided: April 1, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Agnes Holbrook, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 12-7869 Doc: 11 Filed: 04/01/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Agnes order Bernice dismissing her § 1915A(b)(1) (2006). ∗ reversible error. Holbrook civil appeals action the pursuant district to 18 court’s U.S.C. We have reviewed the record and find no Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Holbrook v. Jones, No. 7:12-cv-00380- MFU-RSB 15, (W.D. Va. Oct. 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED ∗ The claims against the district court judge were dismissed with prejudice, and the claims against the remaining defendants were dismissed without prejudice. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?