Agnes Holbrook v. Judge Jone
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 7:12-cv-00380-MFU-RSB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999076771].. [12-7869]
Appeal: 12-7869
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/01/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7869
AGNES BERNICE HOLBROOK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
HONORABLE JUDGE JONES;
PROSECUTOR’S OFFICE,
UNKNOWN
PERSONS
AT
THE
FEDERAL
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:12-cv-00380-MFU-RSB)
Submitted:
March 28, 2013
Decided:
April 1, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Agnes Holbrook, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7869
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/01/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Agnes
order
Bernice
dismissing
her
§ 1915A(b)(1) (2006). ∗
reversible error.
Holbrook
civil
appeals
action
the
pursuant
district
to
18
court’s
U.S.C.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Holbrook v. Jones, No. 7:12-cv-00380-
MFU-RSB
15,
(W.D.
Va.
Oct.
2012).
We
dispense
with
oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
∗
The claims against the district court judge were dismissed
with prejudice, and the claims against the remaining defendants
were dismissed without prejudice.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?