US v. Seneca Allen
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:02-cr-00098-JAB-5 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999054459]. Mailed to: Seneca Allen. [12-7994]
Appeal: 12-7994
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/01/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7994
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
SENECA RAYVON ALLEN,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (1:02-cr-00098-JAB-5)
Submitted:
February 26, 2013
Decided: March 1, 2013
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Seneca Rayvon Allen, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett,
Angela Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Ripley
Eagles Rand, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7994
Doc: 10
Filed: 03/01/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Seneca Rayvon Allen appeals the district court’s order
denying
his
18
U.S.C.
§
3582(c)(2)
(2006)
motion.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
We
Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
States
v.
2012).
legal
before
Allen,
No.
1:02-cr-00098-JAB-5
have
(M.D.N.C.
United
Oct.
31,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?