Allen Wright v. Dr. Bearden
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-03307-TLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999077747]. Mailed to: Allen Wright. [12-7995]
Appeal: 12-7995
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/02/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-7995
ALLEN WRIGHT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DR. BEARDEN; DR. MOORE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken.
Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (1:11-cv-03307-TLW)
Submitted:
March 28, 2013
Decided:
April 2, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Allen Wright, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher R. Antley, DEVLIN &
PARKINSON, PA, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 12-7995
Doc: 14
Filed: 04/02/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Allen
Wright
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint, denying his
motion for extension of time to file a notice of appeal, and
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b)
motions.
Limiting
our
review
to
the
issues
raised
in
the
informal brief, see 4th Cir. R. 34(b), we affirm the district
court’s
orders.
Wright
v.
Bearden,
No.
1:11-cv-03307-TLW
(D.S.C. Oct. 2, 2012; dated Nov. 2, 2012, entered Nov. 5, 2012).
We
dispense
contentions
with
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?