US v. Edward Mintz

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00040-MR-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999101835]. Mailed to: Edward Mintz. [12-8003]

Appeal: 12-8003

Doc: 7

Filed: 05/06/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8003

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
EDWARD BLAINE MINTZ, a/k/a Edward Blain Mintz,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:08-cr-00040-MR-1)

Submitted:

April 25, 2013

Decided:

May 6, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Blaine Mintz, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-8003

Doc: 7

Filed: 05/06/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Edward Blaine Mintz appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to appoint new counsel and for an extension
of time to file a motion to reconsider the denial of his motion
to reduce sentence.
reversible error.

We have reviewed the record and find no

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court.
00040-MR-1

(W.D.N.C.

United States v. Mintz, No. 1:08-cr-

Nov.

7,

2012).

We

dispense

with

oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2