Glorbman Brown v. J. Ewart

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to appoint counsel [999068337-2]; denying Motion to dismiss appeal [999027015-2] Originating case number: 1:09-cv-00573-CCE-LPA Copies to all parties and the district court. [999077852]. Mailed to: Glorbman Brown. [12-8028]

Appeal: 12-8028

Doc: 25

Filed: 04/02/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8028

GLORBMAN LAMONT BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. EWART, CLASSIFICATION OFFICER; NURSE MORGAN;
DEPUTY FAGGART; OFFICER A. LANE; LIEUTENANT LANE,

MASTER

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Catherine C. Eagles,
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00573-CCE-LPA)

Submitted:

March 28, 2013

Decided:

April 2, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Glorbman Lamont Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Kenneth Ray Raynor,
TEMPLETON & RAYNOR, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-8028

Doc: 25

Filed: 04/02/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Glorbman

Lamont

Brown

appeals

the

district

court’s

orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We

have

reviewed

the

record

and

find

no

reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

Brown v. Ewart, No. 1:09-cv-00573-CCE-LPA (M.D.N.C. Oct.

30, 2012; Jan. 28, 2013). *
counsel.

We deny Brown’s motion to appoint

We deny Appellees’ motion to dismiss.

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We construe Brown’s “Traverse to Defendants Motion to
Dismiss Appeal” as a timely notice of appeal from the district
court’s final order.

2