US v. Marty Wright

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999121589]. Mailed to: Marty Wright. [12-8056]

Appeal: 12-8056

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/04/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-8056

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MARTY LORENZO WRIGHT,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News.
Raymond A. Jackson,
District Judge. (4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1)

Submitted:

May 30, 2013

Decided:

June 4, 2013

Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marty Lorenzo Wright, Appellant Pro Se.
Eric Matthew Hurt,
Scott W. Putney, Assistant United States Attorneys, Newport
News, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 12-8056

Doc: 13

Filed: 06/04/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Marty

Lorenzo

Wright

appeals

the

district

court’s

order denying his motion for a “Writ of Coram Nobis.”
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

United

States v. Wright, No. 4:95-cr-00039-TEM-TEM-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 20,
2012).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2