Cora Hill v. James Hawk
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999016190-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00364-MSD-DEM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999075828]. Mailed to: Hill. [13-1028]
Appeal: 13-1028
Doc: 18
Filed: 03/29/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1028
CORA M. HILL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES C. HAWKS, Circuit Judge, Circuit Court of the City of
Portsmouth; GEORGE T. ALBISTON, ESQ.; WILLIAM F. DEVINE,
ESQ.; SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk.
Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-00364-MSD-DEM)
Submitted:
March 26, 2013
Decided:
March 29, 2013
Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cora M. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Nicholas Foris Simopoulos,
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia;
James Arthur Cales, III, Alan Brody Rashkind, FURNISS, DAVIS,
RASHKIND & SAUNDERS, Norfolk, Virginia; William Delaney Bayliss,
Joseph Earl Blackburn, III, WILLIAMS MULLEN, Richmond, Virginia,
for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1028
Doc: 18
Filed: 03/29/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Cora
M.
Hill
appeals
the
district
court’s
orders
dismissing her civil action for failure to establish a proper
basis
for
jurisdiction
over
any
of
the
denying reconsideration of those orders.
named
Defendants
and
On appeal, we confine
our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief.
See
4th
not
Cir.
R.
34(b).
Because
Hill’s
informal
brief
does
challenge the bases for the district court’s dispositions, Hill
has
forfeited
appellate
review
of
the
court’s
orders.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in
forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgments.
dispense
with
contentions
are
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
We
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?