Frederick Onwumbiko v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-01733-AW. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999147920]. Mailed to: Onwumbiko. [13-1040]

Appeal: 13-1040

Doc: 21

Filed: 07/11/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1040

FREDERICK ONWUMBIKO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC; PINTA
GREEN TREE SERVICING, LLC,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
LONG BEACH MORTGAGE COMPANY,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:12-cv-01733-AW)

Submitted:

June 19, 2013

Decided:

July 11, 2013

Before WILKINSON, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Onwumbiko, Appellant Pro Se.
John Sears Simcox,
SIMCOX & BARCLAY, Annapolis, Maryland; John Young Lee, Brian L.

Appeal: 13-1040

Doc: 21

Moffett,
GORDON
Appellees.

Filed: 07/11/2013

FEINBLATT

Pg: 2 of 3

LLC,

Baltimore,

Maryland,

for

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-1040

Doc: 21

Filed: 07/11/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Frederick Onwumbiko appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his complaint for failure to state a claim.
R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).

See Fed.

We agree with the district court that

Onwumbiko’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. *
Accordingly, we affirm.

Onwumbiko v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank,

N.A., No. 8:12-cv-01733-AW (D. Md. Nov. 30, 2012).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

*

We note that Onwumbiko disputes on appeal the district
court’s conclusion that the only fair lending law that J.P.
Morgan Chase Bank is alleged to have violated is the Real Estate
Settlement
Procedures
Act.
We
conclude,
however,
that
Onwumbiko’s action is untimely even considering the alternative
consumer protection statutes to which he directly and indirectly
alludes.

3