Hamid Mahjor v. James Peterson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999017776-2]. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01461-LMB-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999051195]. Mailed to: Hamid Mahjor. [13-1043]

Appeal: 13-1043

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/26/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1043

HAMID R. MAHJOR,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JAMES D. PETERSON, Deputy Commonwealth Attorney,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:12-cv-01461-LMB-JFA)

Submitted:

February 21, 2013

Before AGEE and
Circuit Judge.

DAVIS,

Circuit

Decided:

Judges,

and

February 26, 2013

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Hamid R. Mahjor, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-1043

Doc: 7

Filed: 02/26/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Hamid
dismissing

with

R.

Mahjor

prejudice

appeals
his

the

civil

district

complaint

Commonwealth Attorney James D. Peterson.
record and find no reversible error.

court’s
against

order
Deputy

We have reviewed the

Accordingly, although we

grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.

Mahjor v. Peterson, No.

1:12-cv-01461-LMB-JFA (E.D. Va. Dec. 27, 2012).

We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately

presented

in

the

materials

before

this

court

and

argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2