James Hoskins v. Janet Napolitano
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00639-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999093607]. Mailed to: James Hoskins. [13-1057]
Appeal: 13-1057
Doc: 22
Filed: 04/24/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1057
JAMES F. HOSKINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary
STATES COAST GUARD,
of
Homeland
Security;
UNITED
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-00639-RDB)
Submitted:
April 18, 2013
Decided:
April 24, 2013
Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James F. Hoskins, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Harold Barnard,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1057
Doc: 22
Filed: 04/24/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
James F. Hoskins appeals the district court’s orders
denying
relief
on
his
complaint
for
race
discrimination and denying reconsideration.
the record and find no reversible error.
for
the
reasons
stated
by
the
and
disability
We have reviewed
Accordingly, we affirm
district
court.
Hoskins
v.
Napolitano, No. 1:12-cv-00639-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 28 & Dec. 10,
2012).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?