James Hoskins v. Janet Napolitano

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00639-RDB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999093607]. Mailed to: James Hoskins. [13-1057]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1057 Doc: 22 Filed: 04/24/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1057 JAMES F. HOSKINS, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. JANET NAPOLITANO, Secretary STATES COAST GUARD, of Homeland Security; UNITED Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:12-cv-00639-RDB) Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 24, 2013 Before MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. James F. Hoskins, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Harold Barnard, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1057 Doc: 22 Filed: 04/24/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: James F. Hoskins appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his complaint for race discrimination and denying reconsideration. the record and find no reversible error. for the reasons stated by the and disability We have reviewed Accordingly, we affirm district court. Hoskins v. Napolitano, No. 1:12-cv-00639-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 28 & Dec. 10, 2012). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?