Michael Harris v. Judge Peter Messitte
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 8:12-cv-03807-RWT. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999091429]. Mailed to: Michael Harris. [13-1119, 13-1120]
Appeal: 13-1119
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/22/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1119
MICHAEL EVERRETT HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JUDGE PETER J. MESSITTE; ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 13-1120
MICHAEL EVERRETT HARRIS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. JUDGE PAUL
Attorney General,
VICTOR
NIEMEYER;
ERIC
H.
HOLDER,
JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Roger W. Titus, District Judge.
(8:12-cv-03807-RWT; 8:12-cv-03809-RWT)
Submitted:
April 18, 2013
Decided:
April 22, 2013
Appeal: 13-1119
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/22/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Everrett Harris, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 13-1119
Doc: 11
Filed: 04/22/2013
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Michael Everrett Harris appeals the district court’s
order
consolidating
his
civil
complaints
against
the
United
States Attorney General and two federal judicial officers and
dismissing those complaints as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)
(2006).
We
reversible error.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
Accordingly, we deny Harris’ requests for
counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Harris v. Niemeyer, Case No. 8:12-cv-03807-RWT (D. Md. Jan. 10,
2013); Harris v. Messitte, Case No. 8:12-cv-03809-RWT (D. Md.
Jan. 10, 2013).
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?