Jerome Brown, Sr. v. Richard Fairbank

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999141292-2] Originating case number: 1:12-mc-00028-CMH-IDD Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999179374]. Mailed to: Jerome Brown, Sr.. [13-1257]

Appeal: 13-1257

Doc: 16

Filed: 08/23/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1257

JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RICHARD D. FAIRBANK, Capital One Bank, CEO,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Ivan Darnell Davis,
Magistrate Judge. (1:12-mc-00028-CMH-IDD)

Submitted:

August 9, 2013

Decided:

August 23, 2013

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-1257

Doc: 16

Filed: 08/23/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Jerome

Julius

Brown,

Sr.

seeks

magistrate judge’s order denying his motion.

to

appeal

the

The district court

previously dismissed his proposed complaint without prejudice.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28
U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral
orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).

The

order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an
appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

Accordingly, we

deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal
for

lack

of

jurisdiction.

We

dispense

with

oral

argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
DISMISSED

2