In re: Jerome McFadden
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for other relief [999072204-2]; denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999070557-2]; denying Motion for writ of habeas corpus (FRAP 21) [999059262-2] Originating case number: Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999130868]. Mailed to: Jerome McFadden. [13-1304]
Appeal: 13-1304
Doc: 8
Filed: 06/17/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1304
In Re:
JEROME MCFADDEN,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus.
Submitted:
June 13, 2013
Decided:
June 17, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jerome McFadden, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1304
Doc: 8
Filed: 06/17/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jerome McFadden has filed a petition for an original
writ of habeas corpus, claiming that his due process rights were
violated because his trial counsel was ineffective.
ordinarily
declines
to
entertain
an
original
This court
habeas
petition
filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006), and this case provides no
reason to depart from this general rule.
Moreover, we find that
the interests of justice would not be served by transferring the
matter to the appropriate district court.
See 28 U.S.C. § 1631
(2006); Fed. R. App. P. 22(a).
Accordingly, we deny McFadden’s motion to be released
on
his
own
recognizance
pending
consideration
of
his
habeas
corpus petition, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and
dismiss the § 2241 petition.
We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?