Robert Gross v. Bank of America, NA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-02680-CCB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999236777].. [13-1310]

Appeal: 13-1310

Doc: 21

Filed: 11/08/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1310

ROBERT GOSS; SHIRLEY GOSS,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA, NA, Successor by merger to BAC Home Loans
Servicing, LP,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:12-cv-02680-CCB)

Submitted:

October 28, 2013

Decided:

November 8, 2013

Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Jason Ostendorf, LAW OFFICE OF JASON OSTENDORF LLC, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellants.
Craig R. Haughton, MCGUIREWOODS LLP,
Baltimore,
Maryland;
K.
Lorraine
Lord,
MCGUIREWOODS
LLP,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-1310

Doc: 21

Filed: 11/08/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Homeowners Robert and Shirley Goss appeal the district
court’s

orders

dismissing

their

civil

action

against

the

servicer of their mortgage, in which the Gosses alleged various
Maryland

state

participate

in

law

claims

the

Home

related
Affordable

to

their

request

Modification

to

Program

(“HAMP”), and denying their motion to reconsider that order.
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We
See

Spaulding v. Wells Fargo Bank, 714 F.3d 769 (4th Cir. 2013).
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.

See Goss v. Bank of Am., No. 1:12-cv-02680-CCB (D. Md.

Jan. 8, 2013; Feb. 7, 2013).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

2