In Re: Michael McRae
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999062594-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999062591-2] Originating case number: 5:97-cr-00094-H-6 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999092508]. Mailed to: Michael McRae. [13-1323]
Appeal: 13-1323
Doc: 5
Filed: 04/23/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1323
In re: MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(No. 5:97-cr-00094-H-6)
Submitted:
April 18, 2013
Decided:
April 23, 2013
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Scott McRae, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1323
Doc: 5
Filed: 04/23/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Scott McRae petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on
his
self-styled
Jurisdictional
“Motion
Error.”
He
to
Discontinue
seeks
an
directing the district court to act.
order
Sentence
from
grant
leave
to
mandamus petition.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
proceed
in
court
We find the present record
does not reveal undue delay in the district court.
we
this
from
forma
pauperis
Accordingly,
and
deny
the
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?