In Re: Michael McRae

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999062594-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999062591-2] Originating case number: 5:97-cr-00094-H-6 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999092508]. Mailed to: Michael McRae. [13-1323]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1323 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/23/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1323 In re: MICHAEL SCOTT MCRAE, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (No. 5:97-cr-00094-H-6) Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 23, 2013 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Michael Scott McRae, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1323 Doc: 5 Filed: 04/23/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Michael Scott McRae petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his self-styled Jurisdictional “Motion Error.” He to Discontinue seeks an directing the district court to act. order Sentence from grant leave to mandamus petition. facts and materials legal before proceed in court We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. we this from forma pauperis Accordingly, and deny the We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?