In re: Juan Lopez Preciado
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999063981-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999063959-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cr-00332-TDS-11,1:12-cv-00303-TDS-JLW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999130976]. Mailed to: Juan Lopez. [13-1337]
Appeal: 13-1337
Doc: 5
Filed: 06/17/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1337
In Re:
JUAN CARLOS LOPEZ PRECIADO,
a/k/a Luis Acevedo Gutierrez,
a/k/a
Juan
Carlos,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:10-cr-00332-TDS-11; 1:12-cv-00303-TDS-JLW)
Submitted:
June 13, 2013
Decided:
June 17, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Juan Carlos Lopez Preciado, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1337
Doc: 5
Filed: 06/17/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Juan Carlos Lopez Preciado petitions for a writ of
mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in
ruling on his 28 U.S.C.A. ยง 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion.
He
seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act.
We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in
the district court.
Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition.
We dispense with
oral
legal
contentions
are
before
this
and
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
court
argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?