Adedokun Adekoya v. Eric Holder, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: A098-230-301 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999203276].. [13-1412]
Appeal: 13-1412
Doc: 21
Filed: 09/27/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1412
ADEDOKUN
Adekoya,
IDOWU
ADEKOYA,
a/k/a
Adedokun
Idowu
Oladehinde
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.
Submitted:
September 16, 2013
Decided:
September 27, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Randall L. Johnson, JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES, PC, Arlington,
Virginia, for Petitioner.
Stuart F. Delery, Acting Assistant
Attorney General, Allen W. Hausman, Senior Litigation Counsel,
Jeffrey J. Bernstein, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED
STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1412
Doc: 21
Filed: 09/27/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Adedokun
Nigeria,
Idowu
petitions
for
Adekoya,
review
of
a
native
an
order
and
of
citizen
the
Board
of
of
Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider.
The Board “enjoys broad discretion to grant or deny a motion to
reconsider, . . . .”
Jean v. Gonzales, 435 F.3d 475, 483 (4th
Cir. 2006); 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a) (2013).
This court reviews a
denial of a motion to reconsider for abuse of discretion.
Jean,
435 F.3d at 481.
We have reviewed the record and the Board’s order and
find no abuse of discretion.
Accordingly, we deny the petition
for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
(B.I.A. Feb. 25, 2013).
In re: Adekoya
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?