Arthur Armstrong v. Quentin Sumner
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00425-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999105405]. Mailed to: Arthur Armstrong. [13-1420]
Appeal: 13-1420
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/10/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1420
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
QUENTIN T. SUMNER, Senior Court Judge, Nash County; RACHEL
JOYNER, Clerk, Superior Court, Nash County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:12-cv-00425-F)
Submitted:
April 25, 2013
Decided:
May 10, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1420
Doc: 17
Filed: 05/10/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order
denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion.
record and find no reversible error.
We have reviewed the
Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court.
Armstrong v. Sumner,
No. 5:12-cv-00425-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2013).
We dispense with
oral
legal
contentions
are
before
this
and
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
court
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?