Arthur Armstrong v. Quentin Sumner

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00425-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999105405]. Mailed to: Arthur Armstrong. [13-1420]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1420 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/10/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1420 ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. QUENTIN T. SUMNER, Senior Court Judge, Nash County; RACHEL JOYNER, Clerk, Superior Court, Nash County, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00425-F) Submitted: April 25, 2013 Decided: May 10, 2013 Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Arthur O. Armstrong, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1420 Doc: 17 Filed: 05/10/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Arthur O. Armstrong appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. record and find no reversible error. We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Armstrong v. Sumner, No. 5:12-cv-00425-F (E.D.N.C. Feb. 12, 2013). We dispense with oral legal contentions are before this and argument adequately because presented in the the facts and materials court argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?