Frederick Taylor v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999078355-2] Originating case number: 5:11-cv-00072-RLV-DSC Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999180111]. Mailed to: appellants. [13-1429]

Appeal: 13-1429

Doc: 16

Filed: 08/26/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1429

FREDERICK W. TAYLOR; ALEKSANDRA TAYLOR,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC; POORE SUBSTITUTE TRUSTEE, LTD,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Statesville.
Richard L.
Voorhees, District Judge. (5:11-cv-00072-RLV-DSC)

Submitted:

August 22, 2013

Decided: August 26, 2013

Before MOTZ, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick W. Taylor, Aleksandra Taylor, Appellants Pro Se.
Christina Rampey Hunoval, HUNOVAL LAW FIRM, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-1429

Doc: 16

Filed: 08/26/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Appellants Frederick and Aleksandra Taylor appeal the
district court’s order dismissing their civil action in which
they

sought

vacatur

Carolina home. *
conjunction
error.

with

of

the

foreclosure

sale

of

their

North

We have reviewed the district court’s order in
the

relevant

record

and

find

no

reversible

Accordingly, although we grant the Taylors’ motion to

proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s order.
See Taylor v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC., No. 5:11–cv–00072–RLVDSC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 1, 2013).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

The Taylors initially brought the underlying civil action
in state court, but Defendants timely removed it to federal
court. See 28 U.S.C.A. § 1441(a) (West Supp. 2013).

2