Moses D. Fulton v. DSM Nutritional Products, LLC
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 4:11-cv-03239-RBH. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999206672].. [13-1435]--[Edited 10/02/2013 by BW]
Appeal: 13-1435
Doc: 22
Filed: 10/02/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1435
MOSES D. FULTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DSM NUTRITIONAL PRODUCTS, LLC,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:11-cv-03239-RBH)
Submitted:
September 26, 2013
Decided:
October 2, 2013
Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Pheobe A. Clark, WUKELA LAW FIRM, Florence, South Carolina, for
Appellant.
Christopher G. Mackaronis, BRICKFIELD, BURCHETTE,
RITTS & STONE, PC, Washington, D.C.; Jonathan P. Pearson, FISHER
AND PHILLIPS LLP, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1435
Doc: 22
Filed: 10/02/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Moses
D.
Fulton
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and granting
summary judgment to defendant employer on Fulton’s claims of
racial discrimination.
reversible error.
We have reviewed the record and find no
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court.
Fulton v. DSM Nutritional Prods., LLC,
No. 4:11-cv-03239-RBH (D.S.C. Mar. 4, 2013).
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We dispense with
contentions
this
court
are
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?