Sycamore Grove Homeowners Asn v. Moorish Holy Temple of Science

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999115610-2]. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00025-FDW-DCK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999202292]. Mailed to: Moorish Holy Temple of Science. [13-1467]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1467 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/26/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1467 SYCAMORE GROVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INCORPORATED, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MOORISH HOLY TEMPLE OF SCIENCE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, Chief District Judge. (3:13-cv-00025-FDW-DCK) Submitted: September 24, 2013 Before NIEMEYER and Senior Circuit Judge. THACKER, Decided: Circuit September 26, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Moorish Holy Temple of Science, Appellant. John Watson Bowers, HORACK TALLEY PHARR & LOWNDES, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1467 Doc: 17 Filed: 09/26/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Dianne Michele Carter El-Bay, the self-proclaimed administrator/trustee of Moorish Holy Temple of Science, seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing her notice of removal of the underlying state foreclosure action, and denying reconsideration. Carter El-Bay has failed to demonstrate that she is authorized to litigate on behalf of Moorish Holy Temple. Accordingly, we deny her motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss this appeal. facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. DISMISSED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?