Ronnie Shelton v. Carolyn Colvin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00009-MFU-JGW Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999208614]. Mailed to: Shelton. [13-1504]

Appeal: 13-1504

Doc: 19

Filed: 10/04/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1504

RONNIE T. SHELTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN
W.
COLVIN,
Social
Security
Administration;
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, Department of Disability Services;
DISABILITY
DETERMINATION
SERVICES;
SHARON
L.
GOTTOVI,
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Rehabilitative
Services, Disability Determination Services; BARRY LAWLOR,
Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Rehabilitative
Services, Disability Determination Services,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
PEGGY
CARTER,
Social
Security,
Office
of
Disability
Adjudication and Review; WINNIE J. WHITING, Social Security,
Office of Disability Adjudication and Review,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg.
Michael F. Urbanski,
District Judge. (5:12-cv-00009-MFU-JGW)

Submitted:

September 27, 2013

Decided:

Before MOTZ, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

October 4, 2013

Appeal: 13-1504

Doc: 19

Filed: 10/04/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

Ronnie T. Shelton, Appellant Pro Se. Kartic Padmanabhan, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Erin Laura
Barrett, Pamela Brown Beckner, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF
VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-1504

Doc: 19

Filed: 10/04/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Ronnie T. Shelton appeals the district court’s order
adopting

the

recommendation

of

the

magistrate

judge

and

dismissing Shelton’s civil complaint in part, and granting the
Commissioner’s motion to remand.
and find no reversible error.

We have reviewed the record
Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court.
5:12-cv-00009-MFU-JGW
Feb. 19, 2013).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

(W.D.

Va.

filed

Shelton v. Astrue, No.
Feb.

15,

2013;

entered

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.
AFFIRMED

3