Evelyn Sinkler v. Conseco Life Insurance Company

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying as moot Motion to dismiss appeal [999100724-2]. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999129903]. Mailed to: Evelyn Sinkler. [13-1549]

Appeal: 13-1549

Doc: 26

Filed: 06/14/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1549

EVELYN R. SINKLER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA)

Submitted:

June 10, 2013

Decided:

June 14, 2013

Before GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Evelyn R. Sinkler, Appellant Pro Se.
David Drake Hudgins,
HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrea Rose Simmons,
S.K. HUFFER & ASSOCIATES, PC, Carmel, Indiana, for Appellee.

Appeal: 13-1549

Doc: 26

Filed: 06/14/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-1549

Doc: 26

Filed: 06/14/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Evelyn R. Sinkler appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Sinkler’s
claims regarding a disability income rider to her life insurance
policy.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district

court.

Sinkler

v.

Conseco

Life

1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2013).

Ins.

Co.,

No.

We also deny as

moot the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as prematurely
filed.
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
AFFIRMED

3