Evelyn Sinkler v. Conseco Life Insurance Company
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying as moot Motion to dismiss appeal [999100724-2]. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999129903]. Mailed to: Evelyn Sinkler. [13-1549]
Appeal: 13-1549
Doc: 26
Filed: 06/14/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1549
EVELYN R. SINKLER,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CONSECO LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria.
Claude M. Hilton, Senior
District Judge. (1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA)
Submitted:
June 10, 2013
Decided:
June 14, 2013
Before GREGORY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Evelyn R. Sinkler, Appellant Pro Se.
David Drake Hudgins,
HUDGINS LAW FIRM, Alexandria, Virginia; Andrea Rose Simmons,
S.K. HUFFER & ASSOCIATES, PC, Carmel, Indiana, for Appellee.
Appeal: 13-1549
Doc: 26
Filed: 06/14/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 13-1549
Doc: 26
Filed: 06/14/2013
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Evelyn R. Sinkler appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellee on Sinkler’s
claims regarding a disability income rider to her life insurance
policy.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district
court.
Sinkler
v.
Conseco
Life
1:12-cv-00642-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 12, 2013).
Ins.
Co.,
No.
We also deny as
moot the Appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal as prematurely
filed.
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?