Antoine Ford v. Food Lion, LLC

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999105741-2] in 13-1558, granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999179717-2] in 13-1983 Originating case number: 3:11-cv-00625-RJC-DCK Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999232622]. Mailed to: Antoine Ford. [13-1558, 13-1983]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1558 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/04/2013 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1558 ANTOINE FORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FOOD LION, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. No. 13-1983 ANTOINE FORD, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FOOD LION, LLC, Defendant - Appellee. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Robert J. Conrad, Jr., District Judge. (3:11-cv-00625-RJC-DCK) Submitted: October 31, 2013 Decided: November 4, 2013 Before WILKINSON, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges. Appeal: 13-1558 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/04/2013 Pg: 2 of 3 Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Antoine Ford, Appellant Pro Se. Melissa Romanzo, HUNTON WILLIAMS, LLP, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 & Appeal: 13-1558 Doc: 20 Filed: 11/04/2013 Pg: 3 of 3 Ford the PER CURIAM: Antoine appeals district court’s orders granting Defendant’s motion to enforce the settlement agreement and denying Ford’s second Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Ford v. Food Lion, LLC (W.D.N.C. Mar. 29, 2013 & July 26, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?