In re: Gino Riccelli
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999107960-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999099218-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cv-02481-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999130955]. Mailed to: Gino Riccelli. [13-1567]
Appeal: 13-1567
Doc: 7
Filed: 06/17/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1567
In Re:
GINO M. RICCELLI,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:12-cv-02481-JKB)
Submitted:
June 13, 2013
Decided:
June 17, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gino M. Riccelli, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1567
Doc: 7
Filed: 06/17/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Gino M. Riccelli petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on
his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition.
He seeks an order from
this court directing the district court to act.
the
district
court’s
docket
reveals
that
the
Our review of
district
denied Riccelli’s § 2241 petition on May 10, 2013.
court
Accordingly,
because the district court has recently decided Riccelli’s case,
we
deny
proceed
the
in
mandamus
forma
petition
pauperis.
as
We
moot.
dispense
We
with
grant
oral
leave
to
argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?