In re: Gino Riccelli

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999107960-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999099218-2] Originating case number: 1:12-cv-02481-JKB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999130955]. Mailed to: Gino Riccelli. [13-1567]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1567 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/17/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1567 In Re: GINO M. RICCELLI, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:12-cv-02481-JKB) Submitted: June 13, 2013 Decided: June 17, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Gino M. Riccelli, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1567 Doc: 7 Filed: 06/17/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Gino M. Riccelli petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2006) petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. the district court’s docket reveals that the Our review of district denied Riccelli’s § 2241 petition on May 10, 2013. court Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Riccelli’s case, we deny proceed the in mandamus forma petition pauperis. as We moot. dispense We with grant oral leave to argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?