In re: Jimmie Grubb
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999101283-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus as moot (FRAP 21) [999101281-2]. Originating case number: 3:06-cr-00048-RJC-CH-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999155325]. Mailed to: Jimmie Grubbs. [13-1582]
Appeal: 13-1582
Doc: 7
Filed: 07/22/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1582
In re:
JIMMIE VANCE GRUBBS,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
Submitted:
(3:06-cr-00048-RJC-CH-1)
July 18, 2013
Decided: July 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jimmie Vance Grubbs, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1582
Doc: 7
Filed: 07/22/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Jimmie Vance Grubbs petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28
U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion.
He seeks an order
from this court directing the district court to act.
Our review
of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court
denied Grubbs’ § 2255 motion on May 17, 2013.
Accordingly,
because the district court has recently decided Grubbs’ case, we
deny the mandamus petition as moot.
in forma pauperis.
facts
and
materials
legal
before
We grant leave to proceed
We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
presented
would
not
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?