Earl Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00203-IMK-JSK. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999171133]. Mailed to: Earl Barnett. [13-1604]

Earl Barnett v. U.S. Attorney General

Appeal: 13-1604

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/13/2013

Doc. 404579225

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1604

EARL BARNETT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Department of Justice; FEDERAL BUREAU
OF PRISONS,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg.
Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00203-IMK-JSK)

Submitted:

July 26, 2013

Decided:

August 13, 2013

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Earl Barnett, Appellant Pro Se. Jarod James Douglas, Assistant
United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Dockets.Justia.com

Appeal: 13-1604

Doc: 8

Filed: 08/13/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Earl

Barnett

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge as modified
and

granting

alternative,
employment

Defendants’
for

summary

discrimination

motion

to

judgment,
action

dismiss

and

with

or,

dismissing

in

Barnett’s

prejudice.

reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

the

We

have

Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

See

Barnett v. U.S. Attorney Gen., No. 1:11-cv-00203-IMK-JSK (N.D.W.
Va. Mar. 20, 2013).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2