Ana Cecilia Mongrut-Avanzini v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-00152-CMH-TRJ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999207756]. Mailed to: Ana Cecilia Mongrut-Avanzini. [13-1646]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1646 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/03/2013 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1646 ANA CECILIA MONGRUT-AVANZINI, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; COUNTY OF FAIRFAX, Defendants – Appellees, and COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD; GARTLAN MOUNT VERNON CENTER, ALCOHOL AND DRUG SERVICES; Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:12-cv-00152-CMH-TRJ) Submitted: September 30, 2013 Decided: October 3, 2013 Before MOTZ, GREGORY, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Ana Cecilia Mongrut-Avanzini, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Pace Baucom, FAIRFAX COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, Fairfax, Virginia, for Appellee County of Fairfax. Appeal: 13-1646 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/03/2013 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 13-1646 Doc: 11 Filed: 10/03/2013 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Ana Cecilia Mongrut-Avanzini appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendants in this action filed pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 1755055 Mongrut-Avanzini v. Virginia, No. 1:12-cv-00152, 2013 WL (E.D. Va. Apr. 22, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?