Glenwood Thomas v. Mayor and City Council
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-02479-JKB. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999284287]. [13-1659]
Appeal: 13-1659
Doc: 42
Filed: 01/27/2014
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1659
MR. GLENWOOD THOMAS; MR. ERIC BANKS; MR. LANNY BODDY,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE CITY,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:11-cv-02479-JKB)
Submitted:
January 23, 2014
Decided:
January 27, 2014
Before WILKINSON and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John H. Morris, Jr., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellants.
George A. Nilson, City Solicitor, William R. Phelan, Jr., Chief
Solicitor, Phyllis P. Edmonds, Assistant Solicitor, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1659
Doc: 42
Filed: 01/27/2014
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Glenwood
(“Appellants”)
summary
Thomas,
appeal
judgment
in
Eric
the
favor
Banks,
district
of
the
and
court’s
Mayor
and
Lanny
order
City
Boddy
granting
Council
of
Baltimore City in Appellants’ employment discrimination action.
We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal
and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court.
Council
of
Apr. 17,
2013).
facts
and
materials
Baltimore
legal
before
We
City,
dispense
No.
Thomas v. Mayor and City
1:11-cv-02479-JKB
with
oral
argument
contentions
are
adequately
this
and
argument
court
because
presented
would
(D.
not
Md.
the
in
the
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?