In re: Joseph M. Powell

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999118987-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999126555-2]. Originating case number: 2:93-cr-00004-BO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999236735]. Mailed to: Joseph Powell. [13-1693]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1693 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/08/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1693 In Re: JOSEPH MCCOY POWELL, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (2:93-cr-00004-BO-1) Submitted: October 22, 2013 Decided: November 8, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph McCoy Powell, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1693 Doc: 7 Filed: 11/08/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joseph McCoy Powell petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district court granted relief on Powell’s motion in an order entered on October 11, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Powell’s case, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We oral dispense contentions with are argument adequately because presented in the facts and the materials legal before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?