In re: Joseph M. Powell
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999118987-2]; granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999126555-2]. Originating case number: 2:93-cr-00004-BO-1. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999236735]. Mailed to: Joseph Powell. [13-1693]
Appeal: 13-1693
Doc: 7
Filed: 11/08/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1693
In Re:
JOSEPH MCCOY POWELL,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(2:93-cr-00004-BO-1)
Submitted:
October 22, 2013
Decided:
November 8, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph McCoy Powell, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1693
Doc: 7
Filed: 11/08/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph McCoy Powell petitions for a writ of mandamus,
alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence.
He
seeks an order from this court directing the district court to
act.
Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the
district court granted relief on Powell’s motion in an order
entered on October 11, 2013.
Accordingly, because the district
court has recently decided Powell’s case, we deny the mandamus
petition as moot.
We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis.
We
oral
dispense
contentions
with
are
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
facts
and
the
materials
legal
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?