Lisa McKinney v. Carolyn Colvin

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00199-MR-DLH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999261675].. [13-1703]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1703 Doc: 23 Filed: 12/18/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1703 LISA MCKINNEY, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Security Administration, Commissioner of the Social Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (1:11-cv-00199-MR-DLH) Submitted: November 26, 2013 Decided: December 18, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Sarah H. Bohr, BOHR & HARRINGTON, LLC, Atlantic Beach, Florida; Paul Townsend McChesney, MCCHESNEY & MCCHESNEY, PC, Spartanburg, South Carolina, for Appellant. Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United States Attorney, Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney, Jeanne D. Semivan, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1703 Doc: 23 Filed: 12/18/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Lisa accepting upholding the McKinney appeals recommendation the the of Commissioner’s district the court’s magistrate decision denying orders: judge and McKinney’s applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income; and denying her motion for reconsideration. have reviewed the record and find no reversible We error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McKinney v. Colvin, No. 1:11-cv-00199-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C. Jan. 25 & Apr. 1, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?