Lisa McKinney v. Carolyn Colvin
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:11-cv-00199-MR-DLH Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999261675].. [13-1703]
Appeal: 13-1703
Doc: 23
Filed: 12/18/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1703
LISA MCKINNEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting
Security Administration,
Commissioner
of
the
Social
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:11-cv-00199-MR-DLH)
Submitted:
November 26, 2013
Decided:
December 18, 2013
Before NIEMEYER, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sarah H. Bohr, BOHR & HARRINGTON, LLC, Atlantic Beach, Florida;
Paul Townsend McChesney, MCCHESNEY & MCCHESNEY, PC, Spartanburg,
South Carolina, for Appellant. Paul B. Taylor, Assistant United
States Attorney, Anne M. Tompkins, United States Attorney,
Jeanne D. Semivan, Assistant Regional Counsel, SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION, Boston, Massachusetts, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1703
Doc: 23
Filed: 12/18/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Lisa
accepting
upholding
the
McKinney
appeals
recommendation
the
the
of
Commissioner’s
district
the
court’s
magistrate
decision
denying
orders:
judge
and
McKinney’s
applications for disability insurance benefits and supplemental
security income; and denying her motion for reconsideration.
have
reviewed
the
record
and
find
no
reversible
We
error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court.
McKinney v. Colvin, No. 1:11-cv-00199-MR-DLH (W.D.N.C.
Jan. 25 & Apr. 1, 2013).
We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument
would
not
aid
the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?