Noble Tornello El-Bey v. City of Greensboro
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999136353-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00572-NCT-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. . Mailed to: appellant. [13-1731]
Pg: 1 of 2
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dugdahmoundyah Muurs’ In Propria Persona,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
WILLIAMS; T. G. WALCHER, Badge 522; E. A. CROZIER, Badge
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00572-NCT-JEP)
September 24, 2013
Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.
September 26, 2013
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Noble Tornello Fontaine Pierce El-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. James
Anthony Clark, Associate General Counsel, Greensboro, North
Carolina; David John Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney
General, Raleigh North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pg: 2 of 2
recommendation to dismiss his civil action and impose a prefiling injunction.
We have reviewed the record and find no
We further conclude that the district court
See Cromer v. Kraft Foods N.A., Inc., 390 F.3d 812,
817-18 (4th Cir. 2004) (setting forth standard of review and
Accordingly, although we grant El-Bey leave to
proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
See El-Bey v. City of Greensboro,
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?