Noble Tornello El-Bey v. City of Greensboro

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999136353-2] Originating case number: 1:10-cv-00572-NCT-JEP Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999202099]. Mailed to: appellant. [13-1731]

Appeal: 13-1731

Doc: 15

Filed: 09/26/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1731

NOBLE
TORNELLO
FONTAINE
PIERCE
EL-BEY,
Dugdahmoundyah Muurs’ In Propria Persona,

Washitaw

de

Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE
CITY
OF
GREENSBORO;
CITY
OF
GREENSBORO
POLICE
DEPARTMENT;
HAROLD
THOMAS
JARRELL;
MAGISTRATE
M.
A.
WILLIAMS; T. G. WALCHER, Badge 522; E. A. CROZIER, Badge
116,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro.
N. Carlton Tilley,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (1:10-cv-00572-NCT-JEP)

Submitted:

September 24, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

September 26, 2013

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Noble Tornello Fontaine Pierce El-Bey, Appellant Pro Se. James
Anthony Clark, Associate General Counsel, Greensboro, North
Carolina; David John Adinolfi, II, Special Deputy Attorney
General, Raleigh North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-1731

Doc: 15

Filed: 09/26/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Noble
district

Tornello

court’s

Fontaine

orders

Pierce

adopting

El-Bey

the

appeals

magistrate

the

judge’s

recommendation to dismiss his civil action and impose a prefiling injunction.
reversible error.
did

not

abuse

injunction.

We have reviewed the record and find no
We further conclude that the district court

its

discretion

in

imposing

the

pre-filing

See Cromer v. Kraft Foods N.A., Inc., 390 F.3d 812,

817-18 (4th Cir. 2004) (setting forth standard of review and
four

factors

injunction).

used

to

evaluate

propriety

of

a

pre-filing

Accordingly, although we grant El-Bey leave to

proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court.
No.

1:10-cv-00572-NCT-JEP

2013).
legal
before

See El-Bey v. City of Greensboro,

(M.D.N.C.

March

21,

2012;

May

16,

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

2