In re: Michael S. Gorbey
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999194291-2], granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999157347-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999131959-2] Originating case number: 2:12-cv-00667-RAJ-TEM. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999225505]. Mailed to: Michael Gorbey. [13-1772]
Appeal: 13-1772
Doc: 8
Filed: 10/24/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1772
In re:
MICHAEL S. GORBEY,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(2:12-cv-00667-RAJ-TEM)
Submitted:
October 22, 2013
Decided:
October 24, 2013
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael S. Gorbey, Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1772
Doc: 8
Filed: 10/24/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Michael S. Gorbey petitions for a writ of mandamus,
seeking an order from this court directing the district court to
serve on Respondent his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petitions and
order a response.
Our review of the district court’s docket
reveals that Gorbey’s petitions were served on Respondent, and
Respondent has filed responsive pleadings.
Accordingly, because
Gorbey has received the relief he seeks, we grant his motion to
proceed
in
moot.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
forma
contentions
this
court
pauperis
but
deny
are
adequately
and
argument
the
mandamus
presented
would
not
in
aid
petition
the
the
as
materials
decisional
process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?