In re: Bennie Mack, Jr.
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999133125-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999133124-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00267-WO-1,1:13-cv-00175-WO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999147620]. Mailed to: Mack. [13-1781]
Appeal: 13-1781
Doc: 6
Filed: 07/11/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1781
In Re:
BENNIE AUSTIN MACK, JR.,
Petitioner.
On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(1:08-cr-00267-WO-1; 1:13-cv-00175-WO)
Submitted:
June 24, 2013
Decided:
July 11, 2013
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bennie Austin Mack, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1781
Doc: 6
Filed: 07/11/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Bennie
Austin
Mack,
Jr.
petitions
for
a
writ
of
mandamus, alleging that the magistrate judge has unduly delayed
in ruling on his May 20, 2013 request for order pertaining to
his pending 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2006) motion.
He seeks an order
from this court directing the magistrate judge to act.
We find
the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district
court.
Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma
pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition.
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?