In re: Bennie Mack, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999133125-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999133124-2] Originating case number: 1:08-cr-00267-WO-1,1:13-cv-00175-WO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999147620]. Mailed to: Mack. [13-1781]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1781 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/11/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1781 In Re: BENNIE AUSTIN MACK, JR., Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (1:08-cr-00267-WO-1; 1:13-cv-00175-WO) Submitted: June 24, 2013 Decided: July 11, 2013 Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Bennie Austin Mack, Jr., Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1781 Doc: 6 Filed: 07/11/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Bennie Austin Mack, Jr. petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the magistrate judge has unduly delayed in ruling on his May 20, 2013 request for order pertaining to his pending 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255 (2006) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the magistrate judge to act. We find the present record does not reveal undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?