Paul Yongo v. John McHugh
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:10-cv-00220-F. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999205361]. Mailed to: Paul Yongo. [13-1792]
Appeal: 13-1792
Doc: 10
Filed: 10/01/2013
Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1792
PAUL COLLINS YONGO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE HONORABLE JOHN MCHUGH, in his official capacity as
Secretary of the Army; DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Financial
Management Service; J. HORNE, in his official capacity as a
military pay technician; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY; THE HONORABLE ROBERT GATES; DEFENSE
ACCOUNTING & FINANCIAL SERVICES,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:10-cv-00220-F)
Submitted:
September 24, 2013
Decided:
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
October 1, 2013
Appeal: 13-1792
Doc: 10
Filed: 10/01/2013
Pg: 2 of 3
Paul Collins Yongo, Appellant Pro Se. Matthew Fesak, Assistant
United States Attorney, Seth Morgan Wood, OFFICE OF THE UNITED
STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
Appeal: 13-1792
Doc: 10
Filed: 10/01/2013
Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Paul Collins Yongo appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint.
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court.
we
affirm
for
the
See Yongo v. McHugh, No.
5:10-cv-00220-F (E.D.N.C. May 23, 2013).
We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?