In re: Moorthy Ram

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999155715-2]; denying Motion for writ of mandamus (FRAP 21) [999139893-2] Originating case number: 3:09-cr-00020-HEH-1 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999202236]. Mailed to: Ram. [13-1819]

Appeal: 13-1819

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/26/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1819

In re: MOORTHY SRINIVASAN RAM,
Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.
(3:09-cr-00020-HEH-1)

Submitted:

September 24, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

September 26, 2013

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Moorthy Srinivasan Ram, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-1819

Doc: 10

Filed: 09/26/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Moorthy

Srinivasan

Ram

petitions

for

a

writ

of

mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting
on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2013) motion.

He seeks an

order from this court directing the district court to act.

Our

review of the district court’s docket reveals that the district
court denied

Ram’s

motion

on

August

29,

2013.

Accordingly,

because the district court has recently decided Ram’s case, we
deny the mandamus petition as moot.
in forma pauperis.
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We grant leave to proceed

We dispense with oral argument because the

contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

2