Joseph Sun v. Eric Erickson
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-03582-RMG,2:11-06970-dd Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999264998]. Mailed to: Joseph Sun. [13-1836]
Appeal: 13-1836
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/23/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1836
JOSEPH C. SUN,
Creditor - Appellant,
v.
ERIC JONATHAN ERICKSON,
Debtor – Appellee,
KEVIN CAMPBELL,
Trustee - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Richard Mark Gergel, District
Judge. (2:12-cv-03582-RMG)
Submitted:
December 19, 2013
Decided:
December 23, 2013
Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph C. Sun, Appellant Pro Se.
Eric Jonathan Erickson, SEA
ISLAND CRIMINAL LAW, Beaufort, South Carolina; Kevin Campbell,
CAMPBELL LAW FIRM, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, Appellees Pro
Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1836
Doc: 13
Filed: 12/23/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Joseph C. Sun appeals from the district court’s order
accepting
the
recommendation
of
the
magistrate
judge
and
affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying Sun’s motion to
reopen Eric Erickson’s bankruptcy case, striking Sun’s attempt
to initiate an adversary proceeding, and denying his motion to
reconsider those orders.
We have reviewed the record and find
no abuse of discretion by the bankruptcy court.
Accordingly, we
affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts.
Erickson,
No.
dispense
with
contentions
2:12-cv-03582-RMG
are
oral
argument
adequately
(D.S.C.
because
presented
in
June
the
the
Sun v.
17,
2013).
We
facts
and
legal
materials
before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?