Joseph Sun v. Eric Erickson

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:12-cv-03582-RMG,2:11-06970-dd Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999264998]. Mailed to: Joseph Sun. [13-1836]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1836 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/23/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1836 JOSEPH C. SUN, Creditor - Appellant, v. ERIC JONATHAN ERICKSON, Debtor – Appellee, KEVIN CAMPBELL, Trustee - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Richard Mark Gergel, District Judge. (2:12-cv-03582-RMG) Submitted: December 19, 2013 Decided: December 23, 2013 Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Joseph C. Sun, Appellant Pro Se. Eric Jonathan Erickson, SEA ISLAND CRIMINAL LAW, Beaufort, South Carolina; Kevin Campbell, CAMPBELL LAW FIRM, Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, Appellees Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1836 Doc: 13 Filed: 12/23/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Joseph C. Sun appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and affirming the bankruptcy court’s orders denying Sun’s motion to reopen Eric Erickson’s bankruptcy case, striking Sun’s attempt to initiate an adversary proceeding, and denying his motion to reconsider those orders. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the bankruptcy court. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the lower courts. Erickson, No. dispense with contentions 2:12-cv-03582-RMG are oral argument adequately (D.S.C. because presented in June the the Sun v. 17, 2013). We facts and legal materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?