Aaron Holsey v. Corless Alston

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00994-GLR Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999244426]. Mailed to: Aaron Holsey. [13-1837]

Appeal: 13-1837

Doc: 6

Filed: 11/21/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1837

AARON HOLSEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
CORLESS ALSTON, individually and as acting deputy director
of the Department of Rental and Assisted Housing; D.
MILLER-FORD, individually and as a staff member of the
Housing Authority of Baltimore City; PAUL T. GRAZIANO,
individually and as executive director of the Housing
Authority of Baltimore City; ERICA MANCE, individually and
as property manager of Belleview Manchester Apartments;
FELICIA MARTIN, individually and as office manager for the
CSI Support and Development Services (Coop); BRANDON MOSS,
individually and as building liaison for the CSI Support
and Development Services (Coop); CHERYL ROSS, individually
and as regional manager for the CSI Support and Development
Services (Coop); MONIQUE STARK, individually and as senior
building accountant for the CSI Support and Development
Services (Coop); CSI SUPPORT AND DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
(COOP); THE HOUSING AUTHORITY OF BALTIMORE CITY,
Defendants - Appellees,
and

THE TOWNER MANAGEMENT COMPANY; D AND L REPORTING SERVICES,
Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-00994-GLR)

Appeal: 13-1837

Doc: 6

Submitted:

Filed: 11/21/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

November 4, 2013

Decided:

November 21, 2013

Before GREGORY, DUNCAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron Holsey, Appellant Pro Se. Carrie Blackburn Riley,
Baltimore, Maryland; Nathan Daniel Adler, Brian M. Boyle,
NEUBERGER, QUINN, GIELEN, RUBIN & GIBBER, PA, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-1837

Doc: 6

Filed: 11/21/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Aaron

Holsey

seeks

to

appeal

the

district

court’s

order granting in part and denying in part Holsey’s motion for
an extension of time to respond to the Defendants’ motions to
dismiss.

This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final

orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and
collateral

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1292

(2006);

Fed.

R.

Civ.

P.

54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 54546 (1949).

The order Holsey seeks to appeal is neither a final

order

an

nor

appealable

interlocutory

or

collateral

order.

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense

with

contentions

are

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3