Madeline Moses v. American Red Cross Carolinas R

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999143337-2] Originating case number: 7:12-cv-00306-BO Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999222032]. Mailed to: Moses. [13-1842]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1842 Doc: 21 Filed: 10/21/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1842 MADELINE LEIGH MOSES, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. AMERICAN RED CROSS CAROLINAS REGION BLOOD SERVICES (ARC); PEGGY HUFFMAN; LASHION DARDEN; ERIC HINSON; DELORES SMALLS; JOYCE BRENDEL, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (7:12-cv-00306-BO) Submitted: October 17, 2013 Decided: October 21, 2013 Before AGEE, DAVIS, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Madeline Leigh Moses, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Lee Church, Angelique Regail Vincent, ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON, PA, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1842 Doc: 21 Filed: 10/21/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Madeline order dismissing Leigh her Moses civil appeals the complaint. record and find no reversible error. We Carolinas Region Blood (E.D.N.C. June 14, 2013). pauperis. legal before have court’s reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Cross district Servs., See Moses v. Am. Red No. 7:12-cv-00306-BO We grant leave to proceed in forma We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?