Kevin Umphreyville v. USDC WDVA
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00635-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999244406]. Mailed to: Umphreyville. [13-1854]
Appeal: 13-1854
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/21/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1854
KEVIN C. UMPHREYVILLE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF
VIRGINIA, Harrisonburg Division; THE U. S. FOURTH CIRCUIT
COURT OF APPEALS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:12-cv-00635-F)
Submitted:
October 24, 2013
Decided:
November 21, 2013
Before WYNN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin C. Umphreyville, Appellant Pro Se.
Edward D. Gray,
Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1854
Doc: 12
Filed: 11/21/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin
C.
Umphreyville
appeals
the
district
court’s
order and judgment dismissing his complaint brought pursuant to
the Federal Tort Claims Act.
find
no
reversible
error.
We have reviewed the record and
Accordingly,
reasons stated by the district court. *
we
affirm
for
the
Umphreyville v. USDC,
WDVA, No. 5:12-cv-00635-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2013).
We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately
presented
in
the
materials
before
this
court
and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
*
Although this court has been named as a defendant-appellee
in this action, we exercise our discretion to decide the appeal
pursuant to the Rule of Necessity.
United States v. Will, 449
U.S. 200, 211-17, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980).
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?