Kevin Umphreyville v. USDC WDVA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00635-F Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999244406]. Mailed to: Umphreyville. [13-1854]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1854 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/21/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1854 KEVIN C. UMPHREYVILLE, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA, Harrisonburg Division; THE U. S. FOURTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00635-F) Submitted: October 24, 2013 Decided: November 21, 2013 Before WYNN, DIAZ, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin C. Umphreyville, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1854 Doc: 12 Filed: 11/21/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Kevin C. Umphreyville appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing his complaint brought pursuant to the Federal Tort Claims Act. find no reversible error. We have reviewed the record and Accordingly, reasons stated by the district court. * we affirm for the Umphreyville v. USDC, WDVA, No. 5:12-cv-00635-F (E.D.N.C. June 12, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED * Although this court has been named as a defendant-appellee in this action, we exercise our discretion to decide the appeal pursuant to the Rule of Necessity. United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 211-17, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L.Ed.2d 392 (1980). 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?