Everton Brown v. U. S. Department of Justice
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01954-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999204330]. Mailed to: Everton Brown. [13-1876]
Appeal: 13-1876
Doc: 12
Filed: 09/30/2013
Pg: 1 of 2
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1876
EVERTON BROWN,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:12-cv-01954-WDQ)
Submitted:
September 26, 2013
Decided:
September 30, 2013
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Everton Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Neil R. White, Assistant United
States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1876
Doc: 12
Filed: 09/30/2013
Pg: 2 of 2
PER CURIAM:
Everton
Brown
appeals
the
district
court’s
order
dismissing his civil action seeking relief under the Freedom of
Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2013), for
lack
of
subject
matter
jurisdiction.
record and find no reversible error.
the
reasons
stated
by
the
district
We
have
reviewed
the
Accordingly, we affirm for
court.
Brown
v.
United
States Dep’t of Justice, No. 1:12-cv-01954-WDQ (D. Md. June 12,
2013).
legal
before
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?