Everton Brown v. U. S. Department of Justice

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 1:12-cv-01954-WDQ Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999204330]. Mailed to: Everton Brown. [13-1876]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1876 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/30/2013 Pg: 1 of 2 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1876 EVERTON BROWN, Plaintiff – Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District Judge. (1:12-cv-01954-WDQ) Submitted: September 26, 2013 Decided: September 30, 2013 Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Everton Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Neil R. White, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. Appeal: 13-1876 Doc: 12 Filed: 09/30/2013 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Everton Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action seeking relief under the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C.A. § 552 (West 2007 & Supp. 2013), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. record and find no reversible error. the reasons stated by the district We have reviewed the Accordingly, we affirm for court. Brown v. United States Dep’t of Justice, No. 1:12-cv-01954-WDQ (D. Md. June 12, 2013). legal before We dispense with oral argument because the facts and contentions this court are adequately and argument presented would not in aid the the materials decisional process. AFFIRMED 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?