Marcelo Sol-Flores v. Eric Holder, Jr.

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying petition for review [999148382-2] Originating case number: A097-651-706 Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999324129].. [13-1878]

Appeal: 13-1878

Doc: 24

Filed: 03/27/2014

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1878

MARCELO BLADIMIR SOL-FLORES,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. Attorney General,
Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration
Appeals.

Submitted:

March 18, 2014

Decided:

March 27, 2014

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Amanda Bethea Keaveny, THE LAW OFFICE OF AMANDA BETHEA KEAVENY,
Charleston, South Carolina, for Petitioner.
Stuart F. Delery,
Assistant Attorney General, Cindy Ferrier, Assistant Director,
Tracie N. Jones, Office of Immigration Litigation, UNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-1878

Doc: 24

Filed: 03/27/2014

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Marcelo Bladimir Sol-Flores, a native and citizen of
El Salvador, petitions for review of an order of the Board of
Immigration
immigration
withholding

Appeals

(“Board”)

judge’s
of

denial

removal,

Torture. *

Against

dismissing

We

of

his

his

appeal

requests

from

for

and

protection

under

the

have

thoroughly

reviewed

the

asylum,

Convention

the

record,

including the transcript of Sol-Flores’ merits hearing and all
supporting evidence.
not

compel

a

We conclude that the record evidence does

ruling

contrary

to

any

of

the

administrative

factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B) (2012), and that
substantial evidence supports the Board’s decision.

See INS v.

Elias–Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the
reasons stated by the Board.
13, 2013).
legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

contentions
this

See In re: Sol-Flores (B.I.A. June

court

are

adequately

and

argument

presented

would

not

in
aid

the
the

materials
decisional

process.
PETITION DENIED
*

Sol-Flores has failed to raise any challenges to the
denial of his request for protection under the Convention
Against Torture.
He has therefore waived appellate review of
this claim.
See Ngarurih v. Ashcroft, 371 F.3d 182, 189 n.7
(4th Cir. 2004).

2