Kingston at Wakefield Home v. Kim Dehavion Castell
Filing
UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 5:13-cv-00001-BO,12-04562-8-JRL Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999479836].. [13-1884]
Appeal: 13-1884
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/21/2014
Pg: 1 of 7
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 13-1884
KINGSTON AT WAKEFIELD HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KIM DEHAVION CASTELL,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
JOHN F. LOGAN,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (5:13-cv-00001-BO)
Argued:
September 17, 2014
Before KING and
Circuit Judge.
FLOYD,
Circuit
Decided:
Judges,
and
November 21, 2014
HAMILTON,
Senior
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
ARGUED: Nelson Glenn Harris, HARRIS & HILTON, PA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Robert Lee Roland, IV, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Appeal: 13-1884
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/21/2014
Pg: 2 of 7
PER CURIAM:
The sole dispute on appeal is whether the bankruptcy court
erred
in
treating
a
particular
creditor’s
claim
bankruptcy action as unsecured as opposed to secured.
in
this
As the
second layer of appellate review, we affirm the district court’s
affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s treatment of the claim as
unsecured.
I.
This
action
began
when
Kim
Castell
(Debtor)
filed
a
voluntary petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy
Code on June 20, 2012.
At the time, Debtor was delinquent in
dues she owed the Kingston at Wakefield Homeowners Association,
Inc. (the HOA) in the amount of $678.75.
The debt arose from
Debtor’s ownership of real property in the Kingston at Wakefield
Plantation subdivision (the Subdivision), which real property is
subject to the recorded Declaration of Covenants, Conditions,
and
Restrictions
for
Kingston
at
Wakefield
Plantation
(the
Declaration).
The
HOA
filed
a
proof
of
secured
claim
in
Debtor’s
bankruptcy action in the amount of $678.75, asserting that the
debt is secured by a lien on Debtor’s real property in the
Subdivision.
Debtor objected to the HOA’s assertion that the
claim is secured.
According to Debtor, the delinquent dues are
2
Appeal: 13-1884
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/21/2014
Pg: 3 of 7
only entitled to treatment as a general unsecured claim because
the
HOA
never
obtained
a
lien
on
Debtor’s
real
property
in
accordance with the North Carolina Planned Community Act (the
Planned Community Act), which provides, in relevant part:
Any assessment attributable to a lot which remains
unpaid for a period of 30 days or longer shall
constitute a lien on that lot when a claim of lien is
filed of record in the office of the clerk of superior
court of the county in which the lot is located
. . . . Once filed, a claim of lien secures all sums
due the association through the date filed and any
sums due to the association thereafter.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 47F-3-116(a).
In response, the HOA did not dispute that it failed to
comply with the Planned Community Act.
position
that
“[i]t
is
not
Rather, the HOA took the
necessary
for
a
homeowners
association to file a lien in accordance with the provisions of
the Planned Community Act to have a valid security interest in
the Property.”
(J.A. 15).
The HOA attached a copy of the
Declaration to its response.
Of relevance on appeal, Article V, Section 1, Subsection
(a) of the Declaration provides that annual assessments of the
HOA “shall be a charge and continuing lien on the Lot against
which such assessment is made.”
(J.A. 25).
Also of relevance
on appeal, Article V, Section 12 of the Declaration, entitled
“Assessment Lien and Foreclosure,” provides, in relevant part:
All sums assessed in the manner provided in this
Article but unpaid, shall . . . become a continuing
3
Appeal: 13-1884
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/21/2014
Pg: 4 of 7
lien and charge on the Lot owned by the defaulting
Owner
and
improvements
thereon
covered
by
such
assessment, as of the assessment due date . . . . To
evidence the aforesaid assessment lien, which remains
unpaid for a period of 30 days or longer the Board
shall prepare a written notice of assessment lien
setting forth the amount of the unpaid indebtedness,
the name of the Owner of the Lot and improvements
thereon covered by such lien and a description of the
Lot.
Such notice shall be signed by an officer or
authorized agent of the Association and shall be
recorded in the Office of the Clerk of Superior Court
of Wake County, North Carolina. Such lien for payment
of assessments shall attach with the priority above
set forth from the date that such payment becomes
delinquent and may be enforced by the foreclosure of
the defaulting Owner’s Lot and improvements thereon by
the Association in like manner as a mortgage or deed
of trust with power of sale on real property under
Article 2A of Chapter 45 of the North Carolina General
Statutes subsequent to the recording of a notice of
assessment
lien
as
provided
above
and/or
the
Association may institute suit against the Owner
personally obligated to pay the assessments and/or
foreclosure of the aforesaid lien judicially or may
seek other available remedy or relief. . . .
The
provisions of this Article V shall be in addition to
the provisions of applicable laws relating to liens
established as herein provided.
(J.A. 28).
The bankruptcy court held a hearing on Debtor’s objection
and the HOA’s response.
The HOA argued that it held a common
law lien on Debtor’s real property in the Subdivision in the
amount of $678.75 based upon the language in the Declaration
providing that the annual assessments of the HOA “shall be a
charge
and
continuing
assessment is made.”
lien
on
(J.A. 25).
4
the
Lot
against
which
such
The bankruptcy court sustained
Appeal: 13-1884
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/21/2014
Pg: 5 of 7
Debtor’s objection to treatment of the HOA’s claim as secured as
opposed to unsecured, reasoning as follows:
Because [the HOA] never filed a notice of lien with
the Clerk of the Superior Court of Wake County, its
prepetition claim for delinquent homeowners dues and
assessments was never perfected under N.C. Gen. Stat.
§ 47F-3-116 or Article V, Section 12 of its own
declaration, both requiring written notice of the
assessment lien to be recorded with the Clerk of the
Superior Court of Wake County.
(J.A. 77).
The HOA appealed the ruling to the district court, which
affirmed on the reasoning of the bankruptcy court.
This timely
appeal followed.
II.
On appeal, the HOA continues to maintain that its claim is
secured and asks us to reverse the district court’s affirmance
of the bankruptcy court on that basis.
With respect to the
Planned Community Act, the HOA concedes that it did not file a
claim of lien with the Office of the Clerk of Superior Court of
Wake County, North Carolina on Debtor’s real property in the
Subdivision,
and
therefore,
cannot
avail
itself
of
the
lien
foreclosure remedy of North Carolina General Statute § 47F-3116.
The
HOA
contends,
however,
that
such
noncompliance
is
irrelevant to its ability to assert a secured claim on Debtor’s
real property in the Subdivision under common law based upon the
5
Appeal: 13-1884
Doc: 29
Declaration.
Community
Filed: 11/21/2014
This
is
is
not
Act
Pg: 6 of 7
because,
the
the
HOA
exclusive
argues,
vehicle
the
by
Planned
which
a
homeowners’ association in North Carolina can enforce a lien for
unpaid assessments on a homeowner’s property.
In support of
this argument, the HOA points to North Carolina General Statute
§ 47F-3-116(d), which provided during the time period relevant
to this case:
(d) This section does not prohibit other actions to
recover the sums for which subsection (a) of this
section creates a lien or prohibit an association
taking a deed in lieu of foreclosure.
N.C. Gen. Stat. § 47F-3-116(d) (2011).
With respect to the language of Article V, Section 12 of
the Declaration, the HOA argues that such language “provides for
a continuing lien and charge as of the assessment due date,
which may be evidenced by filing with the Wake County Clerk of
Superior Court, but which, in any event, exists and binds the
Owners
filing.”
and
its
heirs,
successors
Appellant’s Br. at 23.
and
assigns,
without
any
Based upon this argument, the
HOA urges us to conclude that it has a lien on Debtor’s real
property in the Subdivision that is enforceable under common law
regardless of whether the HOA filed written notice of such lien
with the Office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Wake County.
We affirm the district court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy
court’s
treatment
of
the
HOA’s
6
claim
as
unsecured.
Even
Appeal: 13-1884
Doc: 29
Filed: 11/21/2014
assuming arguendo
that
the
Pg: 7 of 7
Planned
Community
Act
is
not
the
exclusive vehicle by which a homeowners’ association in North
Carolina
can
homeowner’s
inconsistent
assessment
Subdivision.
enforce
property,
with
lien
the
a
lien
the
for
HOA’s
detailed
against
a
unpaid
common
law
procedure
homeowner’s
assessments
lien
for
on
a
theory
is
obtaining
an
property
in
the
The HOA’s position ignores the mandatory nature of
the plain language of Article V, Section 12 of the Declaration
detailing the steps the HOA must take to obtain an assessment
lien.
(J.A. 28) (“To evidence the aforesaid assessment lien . .
. the Board shall prepare a written notice of assessment lien .
. ., . . . [s]uch notice shall be signed by an officer or
authorized agent of the Association and shall be recorded in the
Office of the Clerk of Superior Court of Wake County, North
Carolina).
The record is undisputed that the HOA did not comply
with these lien procedures.
Accordingly, assuming arguendo the
validity of the HOA’s argument regarding the Planned Community
Act not providing an exclusive remedy, we affirm the district
court’s affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s treatment of the
HOA claim as unsecured.
AFFIRMED
7
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?