Tessa Childress v. First Citizens Bank

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Originating case number: 2:13-cv-01010-SB Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999202092]. Mailed to: appellant. [13-1886]

Appeal: 13-1886

Doc: 5

Filed: 09/26/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1886

TESSA R R G C CHILDRESS, a/k/a Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson
Carlisle Childress, filed as Tessa Rani Raybourne Gibson
Carlisle Childress,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FIRST CITIZENS BANK, We’re On It; DEVON ORMSON; RYAN FUNKE;
SHAQUITA, Customer Call Center; PAM WELLS; COREY GREENE;
BRIANA, Teller on April 8, 2013; BOSTICK, Teller on April 8,
2013,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston.
Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:13-cv-01010-SB)

Submitted:

September 24, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and
Senior Circuit Judge.

THACKER,

Decided:

Circuit

September 26, 2013

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tessa R R G C Childress, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-1886

Doc: 5

Filed: 09/26/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Tessa

Childress

appeals

the

district

court’s

order

dismissing her civil action alleging a violation of the federal
Wiretap Act.
raised

in

the

On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
Appellant’s

brief.

See

4th

Cir.

R.

34(b).

Because Childress’ informal brief does not challenge the basis
for the district court’s disposition, Childress has forfeited
appellate review of the court’s order.
the district court’s judgment.

Accordingly, we affirm

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2