Carol Pizzuto v. Scott Smith

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--denying Motion for transcript at government expense [999165963-2] Originating case number: 5:12-cv-00149-FPS-JES Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999264965]. Mailed to: Pizzuto. [13-1887]

Appeal: 13-1887

Doc: 29

Filed: 12/23/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1887

CAROL L. GRAY PIZZUTO,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SCOTT R. SMITH; KEITH C. GAMBLE; STEPHEN M. FOWLER; D. LUKE
FURBEE; OFFICER D. L. ROBINSON; HONORABLE JAMES P. MAZZONE;
HONORABLE ARTHUR M. RECHT; HONORABLE RONALD E. WILSON;
KENNETH
W.
BLAKE;
JULIE
L.
KREEFER;
TONI
VANCAMP,
individually and collectively,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
OFFICER S. A. ZIMMERMAN,
Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
Frederick P. Stamp,
Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:12-cv-00149-FPS-JES)

Submitted:

December 19, 2013

Decided:

December 23, 2013

Before SHEDD, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carol L. Pizzuto, Appellant Pro Se. Diane G. Senakievich, David
Lee Wyant, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Wheeling, West Virginia;

Appeal: 13-1887

Doc: 29

Filed: 12/23/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

Stephen Mark Fowler, Kenneth Louis Hopper, Keith C. Gamble,
PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Morgantown, West
Virginia; Deva A. Solomon, Monte Lee Williams, STEPTOE &
JOHNSON, LLP, Morgantown, West Virginia; John Michael Hedges,
Teresa Jean Lyons, HEDGES LYONS & SHEPHERD, Morgantown, West
Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-1887

Doc: 29

Filed: 12/23/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Carol. L. Gray Pizzuto seeks to appeal the district
court’s

order

adopting

magistrate judge.
over

final

the

report

and

recommendation

of

the

This court may exercise jurisdiction only

orders,

28

U.S.C.

§ 1291

(2006),

and

certain

interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006);
Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp.,
337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949).
is

neither

a

final

collateral order.

order

The order Pizzuto seeks to appeal

nor

an

appealable

interlocutory

Accordingly, we deny Pizzuto’s motion for a

transcript and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
dispense

with

contentions

are

or

oral

argument

adequately

because

presented

in

the
the

facts

We

and

legal

materials

before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

3