Ronnie Clarke v. Petersburg City Public School

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999175491-2]. Originating case number: 3:13-cv-00333-REP. Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999244614]. Mailed to: Ronnie Clarke. [13-1906]

Appeal: 13-1906

Doc: 8

Filed: 11/21/2013

Pg: 1 of 2

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1906

RONNIE CLARKE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETERSBURG CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS,
Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond.
Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:13-cv-00333-REP)

Submitted:

November 19, 2013

Before WYNN and
Circuit Judge.

FLOYD,

Circuit

Decided: November 21, 2013

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Ronnie Clarke, Appellant Pro Se.
Zachary D. Cohen, THOMPSON
MCMULLAN PC, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Appeal: 13-1906

Doc: 8

Filed: 11/21/2013

Pg: 2 of 2

PER CURIAM:
Ronnie

Clarke

appeals

the

district

court’s

denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
the

motion

along

with

a

complaint

alleging

order

Clarke filed

that

Defendant

retaliated against him in violation of Title VII of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e–17
(West 2003 & Supp. 2013).

Clarke has also moved to proceed in

forma pauperis on appeal.

We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error.
forma
order.

pauperis

Accordingly, although we grant Clarke’s in

application,

we

affirm

the

district

court’s

Clarke v. Petersburg City Pub. Schs., No. 3:13-cv-00333-

REP (E.D. Va. June 20, 2013).

We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2