Kevin R. Wheeler v. GNMA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999194275-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00745-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999244455]. Mailed to: Kevin and Lisa Wheeler. [13-1920]

Appeal: 13-1920

Doc: 17

Filed: 11/21/2013

Pg: 1 of 3

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1920

KEVIN R. WHEELER; LISA I. WHEELER,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA), a/k/a
Ginnie Mae; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC,
Collectively known as MERS INC and MERS any unknown heirs,
devisees, grantees, creditors, successor in interests, and
other unknown persons, or unknown spouses claiming by,
through and under any of the above named defendants,
Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:13-cv-00745-JFM)

Submitted:

November 19, 2013

Before WYNN and
Circuit Judge.

FLOYD,

Circuit

Decided: November 21, 2013

Judges,

and

HAMILTON,

Senior

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin Wheeler, Lisa I. Wheeler, Appellants Pro Se. Jason Daniel
Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland;
John Young Lee, Brian L. Moffet, GORDON FEINBLATT LLC,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Appeal: 13-1920

Doc: 17

Filed: 11/21/2013

Pg: 2 of 3

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2

Appeal: 13-1920

Doc: 17

Filed: 11/21/2013

Pg: 3 of 3

PER CURIAM:
Kevin

R.

and

Lisa

I.

Wheeler

appeal

the

district

court’s orders dismissing their removed civil action to quiet
title and denying their motion to vacate that judgment.
reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

We have

Accordingly,

while we grant the Wheelers leave to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis, we affirm the district court’s orders.

See Wheeler v.

Gov’t Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, No. 1:13-cv-00745-JFM (D. Md. May 15 &
July 22, 2013).
facts

and

materials

legal
before

We dispense with oral argument because the
contentions

are

adequately

this

and

argument

court

presented

would

not

in

the

aid

the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3