Kevin R. Wheeler v. GNMA

Filing

UNPUBLISHED PER CURIAM OPINION filed. Motion disposition in opinion--granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis (FRAP 24) [999194275-2] Originating case number: 1:13-cv-00745-JFM Copies to all parties and the district court/agency. [999244455]. Mailed to: Kevin and Lisa Wheeler. [13-1920]

Download PDF
Appeal: 13-1920 Doc: 17 Filed: 11/21/2013 Pg: 1 of 3 UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-1920 KEVIN R. WHEELER; LISA I. WHEELER, Plaintiffs - Appellants, v. GOVERNMENT NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION (GNMA), a/k/a Ginnie Mae; MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC, Collectively known as MERS INC and MERS any unknown heirs, devisees, grantees, creditors, successor in interests, and other unknown persons, or unknown spouses claiming by, through and under any of the above named defendants, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:13-cv-00745-JFM) Submitted: November 19, 2013 Before WYNN and Circuit Judge. FLOYD, Circuit Decided: November 21, 2013 Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Kevin Wheeler, Lisa I. Wheeler, Appellants Pro Se. Jason Daniel Medinger, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland; John Young Lee, Brian L. Moffet, GORDON FEINBLATT LLC, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Appeal: 13-1920 Doc: 17 Filed: 11/21/2013 Pg: 2 of 3 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 2 Appeal: 13-1920 Doc: 17 Filed: 11/21/2013 Pg: 3 of 3 PER CURIAM: Kevin R. and Lisa I. Wheeler appeal the district court’s orders dismissing their removed civil action to quiet title and denying their motion to vacate that judgment. reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We have Accordingly, while we grant the Wheelers leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Wheeler v. Gov’t Nat’l Mortg. Ass’n, No. 1:13-cv-00745-JFM (D. Md. May 15 & July 22, 2013). facts and materials legal before We dispense with oral argument because the contentions are adequately this and argument court presented would not in the aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?